Joerg Mayer wrote: > Hello, > > this is just something that went through my mind yesterday while working > on the third patch on the same files and without a chance to commit > between the patches. If there is one thing that I don't like (although > I do it sometimes) is to do a commit that does several things at once. > With git, I could commit each patch (which is done locally) and eventually > push all commits to the central repository while maintaing the indivitual > character of the commits. > I don't like git very much, but that's what various projects I'm tracking > use, so that's why I propose the use of git. Also - if I'm not mistaken - > some people seem to use tortoise and that tool seems to have git support. > > Ciao > Joerg
Hi, I really like the idea and I wanted to propose git, too. It would be much easier to follow changes in the stable/oldstable branches and this is something I need, since I started to maintain the official Debian packages. Cheers, Balint ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
