[email protected] wrote: > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4115 > > --- Comment #20 from Jeff Morriss <[email protected]> 2010-04-27 > 11:00:48 PDT --- > (In reply to comment #18) >>> Is this a 32- or 64-bit process? (Running 'file' on the wireshark >>> executable >>> should tell you.) >> I guess it is the 32 bit edition - I just picked it from the download menu at >> wireshark.org. > > Ah, I suppose that makes sense if we continue to support older versions > (pre-Leopard?) of MacOS.
Given that the MacOS buildbot (at least the Intel one) is so fast, would it make sense to also build a 64-bit version of Wireshark? It seems a fair number of Mac users could benefit from the additional address space the 64-bit version gives. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
