[email protected] wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=32519 > > User: guy > Date: 2010/04/19 04:38 PM > > Log: > If that should truly "never happen", use DISSECTOR_ASSERT_NOT_REACHED() > so it's more clearly marked as a dissector bug. > > (It apparently *does* happen - see bug 4698.)
This has the randpkt test failing on the buildbot. Should it really be backported to 1.2.8? Or should the randpkt test accept dissector bugs as OK (like the fuzz testing)? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
