On Apr 29, 2010, at 10:44 AM, Stephen Fisher wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Maynard, Chris wrote: > >> BTW, I had opened a bug report for this, so if you/Bill/whoever might >> do any more work on this, then maybe you want to track it there? Or >> close the bug if there's nothing else of interest to display? > > Ah, thanks. I usually would know that, but I'm still catching up on old > e-mails from all the lists :-) I added a comment to the bug and left it > open to investigate any other useful information that could be added.
I've added some notes on the byte-order issue, as well as the "infer the snapshot length" issue. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
