On Sat, May 01, 2010 at 10:57:51PM +0300, Kaul wrote: > I've ran clang static analyser on SVN latest and got the following:
> Obviously, there's little chance I can fix all of them. I can try fix > a few from the dissectors I'm familiar with, though. Every little bit of assistance helps! What OS are you running clang on? I started to compile Wireshark on MacOS 10.6 once I saw your message the other day and ran into a few problems it noticed that gcc doesn't seem to care about. The main one was what I termed backwards overflow ;). These were cases where a negative number was assigned to an unsigned 32-bit integers that makes gcc go to zero then to 2^32 and then down the right number. A hex number represents it easily in text, but the 4.2 million or so is hard to follow. Please open a bug report at https://bugs.wireshark.org with just some of the details on what you found - you don't have to list everything of course. It sounds like it would be best tackled by others using clang also I would think. Thanks! -- Steve ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe