Yes, I think maybe this should be done a different way. Now I just need a little more free time...
Stephen Fisher wrote: > It may be a good idea to put a comment in those makefiles to ensure the > libraries stay listed in that order in the future. > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 01:52:46PM +0000, [email protected] wrote: >> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=34093 >> >> User: morriss >> Date: 2010/09/10 06:52 AM >> >> Log: >> From BBA via https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5160 : >> >> Followup to 34081: move libwsutil _all_ the way forward so that our >> inet_pton >> is always linked in before wsock32's. This means that our Windows-7 Win64 >> builds (on which there is a native inet_pton in wsock32) will still work on >> pre-Vista Win64's. >> >> Directory: /trunk/epan/ >> Changes Path Action >> +3 -3 Makefile.nmake Modified >> >> Directory: /trunk/ >> Changes Path Action >> +19 -19 Makefile.nmake Modified >> >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <[email protected]> >> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits >> >> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
