Hi, On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 02:00:44PM -0400, Bill Meier wrote: > Anders Broman wrote: > > Is the script "fixed" to fill out any "holes" in the list with "unasigned"? > > That would be the most efficent use... > > If I do this, match_strval() against the sminmpec list will no longer > return NULL for a "missing" entry (other than "past the end").
Can we use NULLs instead of 'unasigned'? All value_string_match_t functions (except of _match_strval_linear(), which is just wrapper to match_strval()) are using vs->length already. It might not work when wireshark want to iterate through values. (Which reminds me that I forgot to submit patch to support BASE_EXT_STRING in dfilter_expr_dlg.c and rawshark.c...) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
