On Sep 30, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > Anders Broman wrote: >> Hi, >> When using GUIManager for the main menu bar, it blows up loading a file. >> Could some one take a look >> and help me figure out what's wrong? The recent file stuff is also >> broken - probably related. > > It's bailing out here: > > ERROR:column-utils.c:1175:col_set_cls_time: code should not be reached > > That means timestamp_set_type() has not been called. > > When we're not using GUIManager, that function is called (during > startup) in timestamp_format_cb(). > > That function is not called during startup when using GUIManager... > Hmmm, actually it's not being called at all.
It's called in: change_configuration_profile() (after reading the "recent" file, it's set to the value from that file) main(), if "-t" is specified; reftime_answered_cb() (if you answer "yes" to "Do you want to switch to "Seconds Since Beginning of Capture" now?") timestamp_format_cb() (when you explicitly set it through the GUI) change_configuration_profile() is called only in profile_select() and select_profile_cb(), when you choose a profile. The reason why it doesn't start out as TS_RELATIVE in Wireshark is, to quote the comment: so that "recent" in gtk/menu.c can detect this and distinguish it from a command line value That refers to menu_recent_read_finished(), which sets recent.gui_time_format to the current time stamp value if it's not TS_NOT_SET, i.e., if it was set on the command line, that setting overrides whatever is in the recent file. Is there some reason not to read the recent file *before* parsing the command-line arguments, so that we can just have the time stamp format initialized to TS_RELATIVE, override it from the recent file, and then possibly override *that* from the command line? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe