On 1 okt 2010, at 20:35, Fulko Hew wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Sake Blok <s...@euronet.nl> wrote: > Could you please open a bug report at http://bugs.wireshark.org and attach > the two tracefiles so that we don't lose track of it? > > Done, bugzilla entry #5269 submitted. > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5269
Thanks, this will prevent it from being forgotten. I just checked in a partial fix. Now the packets in your trace are indeed decoded, however, there are still some problems with the dissection, so I will leave the bug open until that is fixed too. You can download a version including this fix from http://www.wireshark.org/download/automated/ , just make sure you pick a version with a number higher than or equal to 34316, it will be available in a couple of hours. Cheers, Sake ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
