On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:29 PM, Christopher Maynard < chris.mayn...@gtech.com> wrote:
> Kaul <myk...@...> writes: > > > Hi,Attached please find an incomplete, work-in-progress improved > dissection of > the VNC protocol. > > Hi Kaul, I think it would be better to open a bug report for this and > submit the > patches there. That way, the patches won't be forgotten. > Indeed, good idea - I've attached it to the already open https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4334 . In addition, already submitted parts of the work via a different bugzilla entry (patch applicable to the current dissector) and plan to follow up with another two or so patches. Y. > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
