On Feb 6, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Philip Gladstone wrote: > I'm looking to add names for a dozen or so IPFIX parameters. The current code > is structured so that you need to edit the code to add these new parameters. > The alternative would be to rework it so that wireshark would load one or > more data files that defined the options. This would be significantly more > code, but would future-proof things for a while. > > Which approach do you advise me to take?
My personal preference is for the latter approach - anything that lets protocol support be added/enhanced/updated *without* writing code is, all other things being equal, a Good Thing. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
