Hello On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:27 AM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > However, if this is the cause of > > > http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/builders/Ubuntu-10.04-x64/builds/1452/steps/fuzz-menagerie/logs/stdio > > then that raises the question "why isn't the SERCOS III plugin being loaded > when we're doing the fuzz testing?" If the plugins aren't getting loaded, > that means they're not getting fuzz tested. > > This also raises the question of whether the SERCOS III dissector should be > made a built-in dissector.
I will provide a patch fast for checking if the SERCOS III plugin get's loaded, and if the subdissector table is available (you can expect it today). If you want, I will also provide a patch for removing the standalone SERCOS III plugin and integrating it as a built-in dissector. This will take some time, but I guess by monday it should be done. kind regards, Roland ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
