On Oct 7, 2011, at 9:48 AM, Ed Beroset wrote: > Based on the current discussion about the use of the format field for > proto_tree_add_item(), I have once again revised the patch file for Bug 5531 > ( https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5531 ). It has gotten > a lot of votes and was originally submitted over nine months ago. Is there > something else I should do to help get this in the main build?
See comments in the bug. Is there either a public specification for C12.12 or, at least, an explanation of the part of the protocol responsible for all the ugly stuff in canonify_unencrypted_header()? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
