On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 10:55:33AM -0500, Ed Beroset wrote: > and I see the code you've commented out. However, that also eliminates some > functionality. Specifically that causes autogenerated code to parse the > flags. With the code intact, we get this (an extract from tshark):
I overdid things: I should have only removed the variable ft and all would have been fine. I've corrected that in commit 40516. Sorry Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
