On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 03:05:41PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: > > On Jan 15, 2012, at 1:59 PM, jma...@wireshark.org wrote: > > > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=40518 > > > > User: jmayer > > Date: 2012/01/15 01:59 PM > > > > Log: > > Move gtk to ui/gtk. > > Should those files in the top-level images directory that are only used by UI > code be moved a ui/images directory? > > A quick scan of the source finds a bunch of includes of XPM files from > ui/gtk/*.c files; I'm guessing that they - the .xpm files - would only be > used by UI code, making them candidates to be moved. > > I'm not sure where the .png files are used - are they used as source to > generate files such as ui/gtk/expert_indicators.h? If so, they'd be > candidates as well. (And, if so, what tool is used to generate them?) > > The same applies for expert_indicators.svg. > > Should anything used only by packaging/installer tools be put into > packaging/images or, if they're specific to a particular package > type/installer, an images subdirectory or the top-level directory for that > packaging/installer tool?
Moving the .xpms into ui/ makes sense to me. I'm not sure whether separating the different image type is useful, but from a usage point of view moving the relevant files to packaging/images/ sounds better to me - hmm, or not: If icons/pictures are used in more than one place, we will run into consistency problems - iff they are used in more than one place. And eventually tshark should probably go into ui/text/ as well as all the non-interactive text tools like editcap, dumpcap etc. But I will call it a day (or night) for now. Ciao Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe