On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Guy Harris wrote: > On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:36 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > >> The source file itself is fine (well it no longer aborts for me after >> r41325), but running it through the fuzz tester fails every time. Looks >> like editcap needs some PCAPNG smarts to avoid corrupting the non-packet >> parts. (Or Wiretap needs to not give the non-packet parts to editcap.) > > ...or my recent changes to wiretap/pcapng.c broke something, or....
Without fuzzing, editcap will mangle your test file when converted to pcap-NG, so it's not a question of editcap corrupting the non-packet parts. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
