Joerg Mayer skrev 2012-06-05 21:54:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 10:35:40AM +0000, [email protected] wrote:
http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=41953
User: etxrab
Date: 2012/04/05 03:35 AM
Log:
Use common code to have the same hf field for DSCP in IPv4 and IPv6.
Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
Changes Path Action
+12 -2 packet-ip.c Modified
+1 -0 packet-ip.h Modified
+2 -7 packet-ipv6.c Modified
See my mail on ip_version: I'm going to revert this if there are no
good points to leave it this way. Btw, if someone feels this patch is
"valid", then why was the ipv6 filter removed. As ipv6 is the future
(as everyone knows :) the ip(v4) should be removed instead. Now how
many users would be going to accept the solution that way around?
Ciao
Jörg
Sure if you feel that strongly about the field names, I just wanted to
avoid having duplicated code.
Regards
Anders
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
