On 12 February 2013 01:52, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Hadriel Kaplan <hkap...@acmepacket.com> > wrote: > > > I guess I'll just fix it and have it say "works for tshark only". > > ...but there's not even a guarantee that it'll work for TShark forever, so > I changed your update to use only the post-dissector code. > > Doesn't the -2 parameter to tshark force the two passes?
-- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
