2013/3/13 Evan Huus <[email protected]>: > I believe when building with autotools and passing --with-qt to > configure that the resulting binary is still just called 'wireshark'? > I don't know what happens when you try and build both together, but I > don't have a problem with that producing wireshark-gtk2, > wireshark-gtk3 or wireshark-qt as appropriate. With CMake we can build both together and the qt version is called qtshark. I plan converting the Debian package to use CMake to ship both and simplify the build process.
Cheers, Balint > > Evan > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Bálint Réczey <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to suggest renaming the relatively new qtshark binary to >> wireshark-qt. >> I believe wireshark-qt would align better with the practice of >> providing the very same software >> for different UI toolkits with the same name postfixed by the UI toolkit >> name. >> >> Cheers, >> Balint >> ___________________________________________________________________________ >> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> >> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >> mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
