Ok, Who has time to review this 100kB patch?
Thanks, Jaap On 04/09/2013 03:00 PM, Roland Knall wrote: > Hi > > Could I please bump my request one more time on the buglist? I am > starting to work on some topics for new features on the dissector, and > only want to really start it, as soon as the existing patch went > through. > > kind regards, > Roland > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 12:25 AM, Evan Huus <eapa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:50 PM, Roland Knall <rkn...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Could I please kindly ask some of the main developers to commit the >>> patch in https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8505 ? >>> Evan Huus, who kindly lend me an ear in getting the patch ready is >>> busy at the moment with exams, but has already cleared the patch. >>> >>> All there is left to do would be to submit the patch. >> >> It needs a once-over, as I haven't really looked at it since it was >> rewritten to use TVBs, but most of what was in the first patch made >> sense so it's probably fine. >> >> I'm also in a theatre production starting next week. I don't know why >> I thought lining that up with my exams was a good idea, but there you >> go :P >> >> (Which is to say: I'm going to be very scarce here for a while.) >> >> Cheers, >> Evan ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe