On Apr 18, 2013, at 8:34 AM, okordy <oko...@o2.pl> wrote: > Second idea: Fileshark > I've been thinking of such project a long before GSoC was announced. I really > miss such tool and I really would like to see it. So, I would be glad do it > by myself during summer. > I think, the main concern with this project is to use as much common code as > possible and maintain UI consistency with Wireshark.
...except in those places where the UI *should* be different. For example, when showing a JPEG, Wireshark doesn't have multiple items in the "packet list" pane, because the JPEG is in, for example, a single HTTP message. However, in Fileshark, the dissector might want to have separate items in the list pane for different parts of the JPEG file. > I think it would be reasonable to make it possible to use the same dissectors > as for Wireshark Yes, that's a lot of the point of Fileshark. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
