Yes, and this "function" would take arguments of original frame, offset
where the interesting payload starts and length of this payload. Correct??

Regards,
Vineeth


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Anders Broman <a.bro...@bredband.net>wrote:

>  vineeth vijay skrev 2013-04-18 18:11:
>
>  Hi Anders,
>
>  Do you mean ability to export only the payload protocol from
> tunneled/encapsulated captures like GTP-U etc?
> If yes, +1 :)
>
>   Yes that could be one use case. Probably every protocol using the
> function would have to have code supporting it.
> Regards
> Anders
>
>  Have been looking for such functionality for some time.
>
>  Regards,
> Vineeth
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com
> > wrote:
>
>>  Hi,
>>
>> I think these topics in various forms has been cropping up lately, would
>> it be possible/useful to have a generic feature to “Export” to a new file
>>
>> From a dissector using a tap writing a to a generic DLT with a pseudo
>> header containing pseudo data such as extracts from lover layers like IP
>> port or whatever can be useful
>>
>> and an Indication what the next level protocol is. As an example if I
>> have decrypted and reassembled SIP traffic it could be useful to be able to
>> export that to a new file
>>
>> Just containing the SIP traffic and the IP port combination used. The
>> header would then Indicate the protocol as SIP and the meta data would be
>> of type TLV and added to as
>>
>> Needs arises. Just a rough idea…
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Anders
>>
>>
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> 
> <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe 
> <wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to