On 6/3/13 5:06 PM, Jeff Morriss wrote: > On 06/03/2013 05:15 PM, Gerald Combs wrote: >> It's been fuzzing all weekend without any failures, so at the risk of >> inviting disaster I added r49644 & r49652. I'm hoping to release 1.10.0 >> on Wednesday (June 5th) and 1.8.8 + 1.6.16 on Friday (June 7). The 1.6 >> branch reaches EOL on Friday as well. > > It would probably make sense to bring 49645 over too then: we have proof > that it is needed (with r49644) to fix some fuzz failures: > > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3290#c16 > https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8728
Done. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
