On Jun 25, 2013, at 9:01 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> 
> On Jun 25, 2013, at 11:39 AM, Michael Tuexen 
> <michael.tue...@lurchi.franken.de> wrote:
> 
>> The 32-bit buildbot machine was updated from 10.5 to 10.6 for allowing QT 
>> builds.
> 
> The default build target on 10.6 is 10.6-and-later.
> 
> If we're going to run 10.6 on the buildbot that builds Wireshark-for-10.5, 
> then, at a minimum, we will have to compile everything with 
> -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 - and, if any of the support libraries were built 
> on 10.6, they would also have to have been compiled with 
> -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 as well.
> 
> In addition, we will probably need to build against the 10.5 SDK - and, if 
> the support libraries were built on 10.6, that would apply to them as well.
> 
> I.e., if we're going to continue to support 10.5, either the 32-bit buildbot 
> will have to go back to running 10.5, or we'll have to support building 
> against an SDK (I have an unfinished project to do that for Wireshark) and 
> will have to use -mmacosx-version-min=10.5 if building against the 10.5 SDK 
> doesn't do that already.  (And if you rebuilt all the Wireshark support 
> libraries on 10.5, those will have to be built in that fashion as well.  I 
> don't remember whether I've worked on that or not; it's harder, as we don't 
> control the configure scripts, Makefiles, etc., but by setting CFLAGS and 
> LDFLAGS in the environment, we might be able to make that work.)
I understand. I think we moved to 10.6 for being able to support QT. So I'm not 
sure
if supporting 10.5 is an option. I'm not sure, but I think Gerald had numbers 
about
downloads... I'll leave the decision up to Gerald.

All support libs were build after the system was reinstalled.

Best regards
Michael
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
> 

___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to