On 2013-09-10, at 12:58 AM, Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Evan, > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 09:08:59PM -0400, Evan Huus wrote: >> It should be fixed in r51914 (see the commit message for more details). >> Joerg, please let me know if it now works for you (or if you are in fact >> seeing a different bug). > > Fixed. > > Thanks! > > Now that it is working, the only question left is: What's the use case for > this progress bar?
Not sure, Gerald probably knows the answer. I think probably just to provide an indication that it's not stuck on much slower machines where startup (especially with a cold cache) can take a nontrivial amount of time. > Jörg > -- > Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> > We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that > works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
