What does "more generic" mean in this context?
> On Nov 13, 2013, at 8:15 AM, mman...@netscape.net wrote: > > I was looking at making the "Decode As" functionality more generic, but my > current solution involves having dissectors handle a callback function that > passes in a capture_file* as an argument. Is that valid or does it cross > library boundaries creating unwanted dependencies? > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
