On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 03:34:44PM -0800, Guy Harris wrote: > I think using the number of bits is cleaner, but going that way everywhere, > not just in those macros, *would* be a major change (mechanical, but still a > change).
I only want to make wtap-int.h use pint.h macros, htons(), htonl(), htonll() is kinda easier to write and looks prettier for me than hton16, hton32, hton64(). But it's 2 against 1, so I will make suggested change. Thanks for opinion. Cheers, Kuba. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
