+ another failure that's fixed now - and I've managed to get Wireshark to compile! Woohoo! and thanks for the fixes.
Y. On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Kaul <myk...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also fixed, now epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c is completely broken. > This should fix it: > svn diff epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c > Index: epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c > =================================================================== > --- epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c (revision 53918) > +++ epan/dissectors/packet-smpp.c (working copy) > @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ > > /* Forward declarations */ > void proto_register_smpp(void); > -void proto_reg_handoff_smpp(void) > +void proto_reg_handoff_smpp(void); > static int dissect_smpp(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree > *tree, void* data); > static guint get_smpp_pdu_len(packet_info *pinfo, tvbuff_t *tvb, int > offset); > static int dissect_smpp_pdu(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree > *tree, void* data _U_); > > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Kaul <myk...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> And the above has been fixed. >> Regretfully, replaced by another compilation failure: >> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9543 >> >> Y. >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Kaul <myk...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Above compilation failure has been fixed. >>> Regretfully, only to be replaced by another compilation failure: >>> https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9538 >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Kaul <myk...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Opened https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9529 on the >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Jakub Zawadzki < >>>> darkjames...@darkjames.pl> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 09:23:23PM +0200, Kaul wrote: >>>>> > Thanks for the automated build links - I guess I'll watch them more >>>>> closely >>>>> > and only sync when my platform passes. >>>>> > >>>>> > Interesting - I'm pulling from trunk and still fail on that. Perhaps >>>>> it >>>>> > wasn't fixed entirely, or I have to do some cleanup? >>>>> >>>>> I agree, it isn't fixed, from_hex() is defined inside: >>>>> #if defined(HAVE_LIBGNUTLS) && defined(HAVE_LIBGCRYPT) >>>>> >>>>> but it's used outside this #ifdef. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kuba. >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Hauke Mehrtens <ha...@hauke-m.de> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > On 12/08/2013 04:30 PM, Kaul wrote: >>>>> > > > Hi all, >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > I've been trying to enhance a specific dissector for two weeks >>>>> now. >>>>> > > > Since I'm afraid of diverging the code (although I'm working on a >>>>> > > > specific dissector), I update my code base often (~ once a day). >>>>> > > > Regretfully, 5 times (in 2 weeks!) this has resulted in >>>>> compilation >>>>> > > failure. >>>>> > > > I'm pretty sure (subjectively) this hasn't happened in the past. >>>>> Any >>>>> > > > measures we can put (continuous build system?) in place to >>>>> prevent this? >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Today's failure (2nd failure only today btw): >>>>> > > > make[5]: Entering directory >>>>> `/home/yanivk/wireshark/epan/dissectors' >>>>> > > > CC libdissectors_la-packet-ssl-utils.lo >>>>> > > > packet-ssl-utils.c: In function 'ssl_keylog_parse_session_id': >>>>> > > > packet-ssl-utils.c:4201:9: error: implicit declaration of >>>>> function >>>>> > > > 'from_hex_char' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>>> > > > if (from_hex_char(line[2*i]) != >>>>> > > > (ssl_session->session_id.data[i] >> 4) || >>>>> > > > ^ >>>>> > > > packet-ssl-utils.c:4218:5: error: implicit declaration of >>>>> function >>>>> > > > 'from_hex' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>>> > > > if (!from_hex(&ssl_session->master_secret, line, len)) >>>>> > > > ^ >>>>> > > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors >>>>> > > > make[5]: *** [libdissectors_la-packet-ssl-utils.lo] Error 1 >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > Thanks, >>>>> > > > Y. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Hi, >>>>> > > >>>>> > > There are automated build, they are described here: >>>>> > > >>>>> http://www.wireshark.org/docs/wsdg_html_chunked/ChIntroAutomated.html >>>>> > > >>>>> > > The last build results are here: >>>>> > > http://buildbot.wireshark.org/trunk/one_line_per_build >>>>> > > >>>>> > > The problem you current have was already fixed in current trunk >>>>> some >>>>> > > hours ago. >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Hauke >>>>> > > >>>>> >>>>> > >>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>>>> > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >>>>> > >>>>> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>>>> > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>>>> > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________ >>>>> Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> >>>>> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev >>>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev >>>>> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org >>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
