On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 02:23:54PM -0500, mman...@netscape.net wrote: > Is proto_field_is_references still a valid function? > > In looking at the intent, it either looks completely useless or should be > used on almost all dissectors.
My old mail about proto_field_is_references() http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev/201205/msg00028.html I think 3/ is already fixed. 1 & 2 are still an issue. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
