Hi, It is possible to create a bug in bugtracker and attach pcap samples (and the screen in OmniPeek) ?
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:44 PM, Emburey Samrex Edward -X (emedward - EMBED UR SYSTEMS at Cisco) <emedw...@cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Guy, Alexis, > > > > I think, I should have mentioned this earlier. > > > > There does exist two different headers: a 20-byte (legacy) and a 55-byte > (with additional, 802.11n support) > > > > To accommodate the 802.11n header, we would need a different dissection at > dissect_peekremote(), apart from the way legacy header had been dealt. > > May be, we can have the ‘magic number’ as reference from the obtained > hex-dump, to choose between the two dissection methods. > > > > PFA the difference in dissection that omnipeek performs on a 20-byte and a > 55-byte header. (compare_80211n_legacy_omnipeek.png) > > I believe it helps in the classification of fields to be done at > dissect_peekremote(). > > > > Please let me know your further queries/comments. > > Once clear, I’ll go ahead to file a bug, with all these snaps & pkt > captures. > > > > > > Thanks and Regards, > > Emburey > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
