Sorry, this was my mistake. I got it into my head that I'd landed the smb-direct dissector for some reason, when I clearly hadn't.
That kind of day, I guess. On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Wireshark code review <code-review-do-not-re...@wireshark.org> wrote: > URL: > https://code.wireshark.org/review/gitweb?p=wireshark.git;a=commit;h=75015e4351e666cdbd89e4c459aed91bc462c2cc > Submitter: Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu) > Changed: branch: master > Repository: wireshark > > Commits: > > 75015e4 by Guy Harris (g...@alum.mit.edu): > > Can't register in a non-existent dissector table. > > This will have to wait until the SMB Direct dissector is actually > committed. There's no point in getting a bunch of "OOPS: dissector > table "smb_direct" doesn't exist" messages every time you run Wireshark > or TShark. > > Change-Id: I9772eb3f119822fbeaa78876570798d49bb4cab9 > Reviewed-on: https://code.wireshark.org/review/382 > Reviewed-by: Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> > > > Actions performed: > > from 1084b88 Fix indentation. > adds 75015e4 Can't register in a non-existent dissector table. > > > Summary of changes: > epan/dissectors/packet-smb.c | 1 - > epan/dissectors/packet-smb2.c | 1 - > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-) > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-commits mailing list <wireshark-comm...@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-commits > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-commits > > mailto:wireshark-commits-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
