If you've got git review installed you can just run that instead of pushing at 
all. We've got the config set up so it should just do the right thing.

> On Mar 11, 2014, at 11:01 AM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 03/11/14 10:28, Bálint Réczey wrote:
>> 2014-03-11 15:00 GMT+01:00 Martin Mathieson 
>> <martin.r.mathie...@googlemail.com>:
>>> I too am looking forward to seeing this.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 03/08/14 04:46, Anders Broman wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pascal Quantin skrev 2014-03-08 09:56:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 08/03/2014 09:45, Anders Broman a écrit :
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks a million Pascal, I have to try to find the time to get going
>>>>> with git :-(
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Honestly I'd suggest waiting until someone has written the suggested
>>>> how-to-use-it guide (on the wiki?).
>> I would rather consider reading Pro Git. :-)
>> It is not that long and it is well written.
> 
> Yeah, I did.  And I've still had several instances where I set up a new clone 
> and either:
> 
>    end up with a push that goes nowhere (forgot to run "git config --add 
> remote.origin.push HEAD:refs/for/master"?)
> 
>    end up blowing away my clone and starting again because I did something 
> else wrong
> 
> Step-by-step instructions would prevent that kind of thing.
> 
> (I think the major problem is that there are quite a number of commands to 
> run to get it working; you can get a working clone easily enough but getting 
> pushes working is a-whole-nother matter.  I think my last blow-up was 
> probably caused because I thought "git review -s" would set everything up for 
> me but then my "git push" went to oblivion.  And, no, I don't intend to ever 
> type something as long as "git push origin HEAD:refs/for/master" on a regular 
> basis--unless it can be set up with tab completion :-).)
> 
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>            mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to