Hi Pavel, Can you use the revised workflow and submit the change to Gerrit. Any discussion on the proposed change will take place in the Gerrit Review process.
Workflow info can be found here: http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Workflow On 28 March 2014 15:06, Pavel Karneliuk <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > At first, thank you all for Wireshark. It is amazing tool! > > > I found a defect and register Bug > 9936<https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9936>– > “epan/follow.c - Incorrect comparing a sequence number of TCP fragment > when its value wraps over uint32_t limit” > A capture file and my patch are attached to bug in Bugzilla. > > Patch is a one-line fix: > > --- a/epan/follow.c > > +++ b/epan/follow.c > > @@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ check_fragments( int idx, tcp_stream_chunk *sc, > guint32 acknowledged ) { > > lowest_seq = current->seq; > > } > > - if( current->seq < seq[idx] ) { > > + if( LT_SEQ(current->seq, seq[idx]) ) { > > guint32 newseq; > > /* this sequence number seems dated, but > > check the end to make sure it has no more > > > > It is just a replacement a compare operator to wraps-friendly macro. > Similar to code around (with GT_SEQ usage). > What do you think? > > > > Best Regards, > *Pavel Karneliuk* > Senior Software Engineer > > EPAM Systems > Minsk office, Belarus > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:[email protected] > ?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
