On 24 July 2014 18:51, Pascal Quantin <pascal.quan...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Le 24/07/2014 19:39, Joerg Mayer a écrit :
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 06:20:48PM +0100, Graham Bloice wrote:
> >> On 24 July 2014 18:08, Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> wrote:
> >>
> >>> IIRC there was some discussion which versions of VS should still be
> >>> supported,
> >>> but I failed to find it in the archives. So, was there some consensus
> >>> which is
> >>> the oldest version we are going to support with master?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> I brought up the issue of moving to VS2013 for master, and separately
> >> dropping info from the (master) docs for earlier than VS2010.
> >>
> >> I didn't see any requests for support to build with earlier than 2010,
> >> although Guy did wonder about the doc changes, but no real conclusion
> was
> >> reached.
> >>
> >> Personally I would make 2013 the minimum supported for master.
> > Hmm, OK. So we need an updated developer's guide setup section. I will
> try
> > to update my Windows vom 2010 to 2013 and see how it goes - just have to
> > find out how to snapshot the VM first ;->
> > Could you update Makefile.nmake and config.nmake to rip out all the
> > stuff that deals with older versions? That would make my life with the
> > CMake work on Windows somewhat easier  ;-)
> >
> > Thanks
> >    Jörg
> Could not we keep at least VS2010 but change the default to VS2013 (if
> everybody agree)? I find it a quite drastic change to drop all older
> compilers suddenly... This is not something we have done in the past.
>
>
That was what I was meaning, we would leave support for VS2010, and fix up
whatever is needed for 2012 & 2013.  2013 builds well for me.  The
toolchain in 2013 is a big improvement over 2010.

I think we can make nmake autodetect the version and possibly CMake too,
although that likes to make it's own mind up so needs a command line switch
if you have multiple versions.

-- 
Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to