On 31 July 2014 17:34, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> wrote: > On 7/31/14 6:08 AM, Graham Bloice wrote: > > On 31 July 2014 11:42, Bálint Réczey <bal...@balintreczey.hu > > <mailto:bal...@balintreczey.hu>> wrote: > > > > +1 for dropping autotools in favor of CMake. CMake already covers all > > my use cases. > > Same here except for Windows. I've been doing most of my Qt development > using Qt Creator + CMake. It doesn't have all the conveniences of Qt > Creator + QMake but it works well enough. > > > I also support dropping nmake, but since I'm not building on Windows > I > > can't tell if CMake is complete enough. > > > > Not yet. Working on it though. > > I added "msbuild" steps to the Windows buildslaves after the "cmake" > steps. The 32-bit build succeeds although I haven't tried running it. > The 64-bit build passes /MACHINE:X86 to the linker which then fails. > > I'm not that happy about CMake's handling of x86/amd64 issues. It should be able to emit a VS .sln that handles both types of builds, but I haven't yet looked into what's needed to make that work.
-- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
