If someone starts to work on the Decode As stuff for qtshark:
Can you please give me the same command line options as with tshark?
The need to in some cases click half a dozen decode as dialogs and
repeat that on the next capture again has annoyed me quite a few
times with gtkshark.

Thanks
   Jörg

On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 03:33:29PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> 
> On Aug 4, 2014, at 1:13 PM, Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagou...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> > The decode As feature work for you with Wireshark Qt (qtshark)
> > 
> > I have try on Windows, Linux, Mac OS X and don't work for me... (the
> > value is never save...)
> 
> Isn't saved, as in "isn't written to the decode_as_entries file", or is saved 
> but doesn't work?
> 
> > if i try with GTK and reopen with Qt works...
> 
> For uint dissector tables, GTK+ was writing out the value in decimal, 
> regardless of the base of the value for the table; Qt was writing it out in 
> hex if the base for the value was hex.
> 
> The code to *read* the tables assumed decimal, and read a hex value as 0, 
> because it was using atoi().  I fixed it to use strtol() with a base argument 
> of 0 (so that a number beginning with 0x or 0X is treated as hex), and to 
> check that that the string was a valid number and the value was in the range 
> 0 -> UINT_MAX and report lines where it isn't.
> 
> This fixes it to the extent that the saved values work; I backported that fix 
> to the 1.12 branch.
> 
> However, if I change it in Qt, the change doesn't take effect until I quit 
> and restart Wireshark, so there's another bug hiding there.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

-- 
Joerg Mayer                                           <jma...@loplof.de>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to