2014-08-25 16:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Sharpe <[email protected]>:
> Oops, screen shot now attached ... > > On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:39 AM, Anders Broman > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe > > Sent: den 25 augusti 2014 00:06 > > To: Developer support list for Wireshark > > Subject: [Wireshark-dev] Should labels in the tree view for the 802.11ad > > dissector additions conform to the spec? > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > I notice, as in the attached screen shot, that the 802.11ad dissector > > additions label the field that the spec (available for free from > > http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11ad-2012.pdf) calls > the > > Control Frame Extension simply as the Extension. > > > > > > > > While it could be considered obvious, I tend to believe that it should > > conform fully to the spec. > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > Although no screen shot attached, I agree using the name from the spec is > > the way to go. > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/3916/ Regards, Pascal.
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
