On Thursday 20 November 2014 13:26:29 Bálint Réczey wrote: > 2014-11-20 9:53 GMT+01:00 Maarten Bezemer <[email protected]>: > > On Thursday 13 November 2014 15:15:26 you wrote: > >> On Thursday 13 November 2014 13:56:26 Graham Bloice wrote: > >> > While I'm all for making life easier for devs, if no-one else has > >> > identified this as a need, i.e. only you find it worthwhile, then we > >> > will > >> > end up with stuff not generally used in the repo and then who will be > >> > maintaining these bits of CMake? > >> > >> [1] is an attempt I found to have out of source builds. But it never got > >> fed back to Wireshark and consists (eventually) outdated scripts. By > >> integrating such functionality, keeps the development scripts up-to-date. > >> > >> I am also willing to write a (wiki) document explaining the out of source > >> builds (when my patches get accepted) to help out others as well. As the > >> current information about this subject on the Internet is very minimal. > >> > >> The maintenance of my patches is not too hard I think. I mainly use > >> (cmake) > >> scripts that are already available. The changes I made are to make them > >> more generic, e.g. by getting rid of hard-coded paths. All scripts are > >> also/already used when Wireshark itself gets build. > > > > Is there anything left for me to do or to explain? > > I would like gain some momentum either direction (approved or abandoned), > > so I know whether my current (out of source) plug-in implementation can > > be used at work or not. > > I was waiting for Jörg to comment on the change, but I have submitted > it instead: > https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/5316/
I saw, also that my two related patches are abandoned. I was wondering about my actual 'out of source' patches. But as already mentioned by Graham Bloice, there are some (lack of) spare time issues. So, I will just wait until time permits to proper look at/review them. Regards, Maarten ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
