On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 03:34:16PM -0500, Ed Beroset wrote: > Having been around this particular block a couple of times, yes, CMake > at times is a battle, but it's also better than the alternative of > producing (and maintaining) multiple mutually incompatible and > inevitably arbitrarily different build systems in parallel.
The beauty of autoconf/automake on Unix is that it spits out standard MakefileS so that normal users don't have to install a special program just to build the software. I haven't tried Wireshark with CMake yet, but doesn't every user have to install it to build the software? Or can cmake's output be included in source distributions so only developers need it? ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
