On 4 March 2015 at 19:04, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/04/15 11:55, Graham Bloice wrote: > >> On 4 March 2015 at 16:44, Jeff Morriss <jeff.morriss...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jeff.morriss...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> On 03/04/15 04:07, Michal Labedzki wrote: >> >> On 03/03/15 11:50, Alexis La Goutte wrote: >> >> And also if i remember the target is only have CMake for >> build system >> (and remove autofoo...) >> >> >> I hope there will be only CMake in near future (imply remove >> autotools). As I know cmake aka build systems working for all >> platforms. What about remove building part of autotools, use >> cmake for >> that and use autotools for other tasks? >> >> >> It may work but last I checked it didn't work too well: there's a >> bunch of stuff that works when running from an autotools build >> directory that doesn't from a cmake directory. And it doesn't >> appear many people have been working on that. >> >> >> Maybe that should be enumerated somewhere. I've only built (off >> Windows) on Ubuntu using CMake and it worked for me. On Windows there >> are a few bits left to finish off, but I think the nmake usage is coming >> to an end. >> > > It generally works it's just missing features. A bunch are documented in > README.cmake but not all. For example I think Evan found that the test > suite--at least the Lua portion--don't work in cmake builds; I fixed that > in autotools (starting with https://code.wireshark.org/review/3348) but I > don't think anyone has touched the cmake part (I gave up even thinking > about cmake a while ago). > > Must force change of Jeff's viewpoint of CMake I'l be sending the vibes over later :-) -- Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
