On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Guy Harris <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> On Apr 30, 2015, at 9:58 AM, Joerg Mayer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > jmayer@egg epan$ wireshark
> > QMetaObject::connectSlotsByName: No matching signal for
> on_actionExternalMenuItem_triggered()
>
About this warning, i coming from eeed4d1121f122aa5579153872193b9a91d8ad52
We don't use on_xxx_triggered() function, it is a magic Qt function to
automatically "link" signal and slot (
http://qtway.blogspot.no/2010/08/automatic-connections-using-qt-signals.html
)
rename function, it will be fix the warning

> ../../asn1/c1222/packet-c1222-template.c:1427:3: runtime error: null
> pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null
> > ../../asn1/c1222/packet-c1222-template.c:1427:3: runtime error: null
> pointer passed as argument 2, which is declared to never be null
>
> That probably means that oid_string2encoded() failed.
>
> Pascal Quantin's working on a fix for this:
>
>         https://code.wireshark.org/review/8251
>
> but presumably the failure means either that
>
>         1) you specified an invalid (not a syntactically-valid OID)
> setting for the "Base OID to use for relative OIDs" preference for the
> C.1222 dissector
>
> or
>
>         2) you have no setting for it so that the string is null (which
> is, as far as I know, not a syntactically-valid OID)
>
> and I strongly suspect it's 2) here, so perhaps that code should also
> special-case null strings.  (Ultimately, we should catch
> syntactically-invalid OIDs rather than just silently ignoring them.)
>
> Hopefully, the code also can handle a missing OID.
>
> > 18:37:43          Dbg  plugin_dir: /opt/test/lib/wireshark/plugins/1.99.6
> > ERROR: Cannot connect to ADB: Connection refused
> > INFO: Please check that adb daemon is running.
> > ==> after double clicking the wlan0 interface
> > /home/jmayer/work/wireshark/git/wsutil/sign_ext.h:53:33: runtime error:
> left shift of negative value -1
>
> So is this presumably from C99's
>
>         6.5.7 Bitwise shift operators
>
>                 ...
>
>                 The result of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit
> positions; vacated bits are filled with zeros. ... *If E1 has a signed type
> and nonnegative value, and E1 × 2^E2 is representable in the result type,
> then that is the resulting value; otherwise, the behavior is undefined.*
>
> The intent of the shifts in the "val |= (-1 << no_of_bits)" in
>
>         /* sign extension routines */
>
>         static inline guint32
>         ws_sign_ext32(guint32 val, int no_of_bits)
>         {
>                 g_assert (no_of_bits >= 0 && no_of_bits <= 32);
>
>                 if (no_of_bits == 0)
>                         return val;
>
>                 if (val & (1 << (no_of_bits-1)))
>                         val |= (-1 << no_of_bits);
>
>                 return val;
>         }
>
>         static inline guint64
>         ws_sign_ext64(guint64 val, int no_of_bits)
>         {
>                 g_assert (no_of_bits >= 0 && no_of_bits <= 64);
>
>                 if (no_of_bits == 0)
>                         return val;
>
>                 if (val & (G_GINT64_CONSTANT(1) << (no_of_bits-1)))
>                         val |= (G_GUINT64_CONSTANT(-1) << no_of_bits);
>
>                 return val;
>         }
>
> is to generate a value with no_of_bits low-order zero bits and all the
> other bits 1, so that bits in the 32-bit or 64-bit value above the sign bit
> in the no_of_bits-bit value are set for negative values.
>
> (Yes, we're assuming 2's complement, but I don't think this is the only
> place, and if you're trying to get Wireshark to run on a Unisys ClearPath
> Dorado system, trust me, that's not going to be your biggest problem. :-))
>
> We might as well just use (G_GUINT64_CONSTANT(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF) <<
> no_of_bits) - and, while we're at it, use (0xFFFFFFFF << no_of_bits) in the
> 32-bit case.
>
> Fixed in I62220808058cb93f83329c1916b888a2067d524c.
>
> > /home/jmayer/work/wireshark/git/epan/proto.c:9154:47: runtime error:
> left shift of 1 by 31 places cannot be represented in type 'int'
>
>
> That should now be fixed by I95cf5ce53aa3b94ccb9f246d31863715bb682409, if
> I understand the complaint - bitmasks for testing individual bits should
> probably be given as "1U << xxx" rather than "1 << XXX" so that the type is
> "unsigned int".
>
> There are probably other cases where that needs to be done.  The bit tests
> in the wsutil/sign_ext.h code above is one of them; that's also fixed by
> I62220808058cb93f83329c1916b888a2067d524c.
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:[email protected]
> ?subject=unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <[email protected]>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to