Hello, after running make in the asn1 directory, I found the generated credssp dissector changed:
""" index d418e17..03eea46 100644 --- a/epan/dissectors/packet-credssp.c +++ b/epan/dissectors/packet-credssp.c @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ dissect_credssp_heur(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *parent_tree, tags_bit_field = EXP_PDU_TAG_IP_SRC_BIT + EXP_PDU_TAG_IP_DST_BIT + EXP_PDU_TAG_SRC_PORT_BIT+ EXP_PDU_TAG_DST_PORT_BIT + EXP_PDU_TAG_ORIG_FNO_BIT; - exp_pdu_data = load_export_pdu_tags(pinfo, EXP_PDU_TAG_PROTO_NAME, "credssp", &tags_bit_field, 1); + exp_pdu_data = load_export_pdu_tags(pinfo, "credssp", -1, &tags_bit_field, 1); exp_pdu_data->tvb_captured_length = tvb_captured_length(tvb); exp_pdu_data->tvb_reported_length = tvb_reported_length(tvb); """ Trying to compile that version fails: """ [ 13%] Building C object epan/CMakeFiles/epan.dir/dissectors/packet-credssp.c.o ../../asn1/credssp/packet-credssp-template.c:115:58: error: incompatible pointer to integer conversion passing 'const char [8]' to parameter of type 'guint' (aka 'unsigned int') [-Werror,-Wint-conversion] exp_pdu_data = load_export_pdu_tags(pinfo, "credssp", -1, &tags_bit_field, 1); ^~~~~~~~~ /Users/jmayer/tmpwork/wireshark/git/epan/exported_pdu.h:161:78: note: passing argument to parameter 'tag_type' here WS_DLL_PUBLIC exp_pdu_data_t *load_export_pdu_tags(packet_info *pinfo, guint tag_type, const char... ^ ../../asn1/credssp/packet-credssp-template.c:115:69: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'int' to parameter of type 'const char *' [-Werror,-Wint-conversion] exp_pdu_data = load_export_pdu_tags(pinfo, "credssp", -1, &tags_bit_field, 1); ^~ /Users/jmayer/tmpwork/wireshark/git/epan/exported_pdu.h:161:100: note: passing argument to parameter 'proto_name' here ...exp_pdu_data_t *load_export_pdu_tags(packet_info *pinfo, guint tag_type, const char* proto_name, ^ 2 errors generated. """ Any ideas what is going on here? Thanks Jörg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe