I've changed the pcap by hand using cmake-gui. Works but have not tried
running it against anything or capturing.

regards

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 11:14 AM, Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 09:36:47PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> > On Oct 27, 2016, at 8:54 PM, Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > On Oct 27, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> (the policy 42 stuff fixes
> > >> the symptom instead of the root cause).
> > >
> > > ...the policy 42 stuff.  Apple doesn't build libpcap with an @rpath
> install_name, and we don't do so with autotools, so I'm not sure whether we
> want to do that.
> >
> > Actually, for that reason, we *do* want to set that policy to "OLD", so
> we don't get an @rpath install name and don't get suggestions from CMake
> that we should want it, so I checked that one in as well.
>
> OK, after building libpcap with autotools to have an install target and
> fixing two
> warnings turning errors in Wireshark I now have a "working" version with
> rpcap compiled
> in (at least config.h has both HAVE_REMOTE and HAVE_PCAP_REMOTE) - it just
> fails
> to pick up the newly compiled and installed version of libpcap and uses
> the system version
> instead:
>
> jmayer@newegg:~/worktmp/wireshark$ otool -L /usr/local/bin/Wireshark.app/
> Contents/MacOS/Wireshark
> /usr/local/bin/Wireshark.app/Contents/MacOS/Wireshark:
> ...
>         /usr/lib/libpcap.A.dylib (compatibility version 1.0.0, current
> version 1.0.0)
> ...
>
> Wireshark itself was built using cmake.
>
> Ideas how to fix this?
>
> Thanks
>   Jörg
>
> --
> Joerg Mayer                                           <jma...@loplof.de>
> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
> works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=
> unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to