Hi Alexander, good to see you again. We worked together in the DVC-CI+ group back in 2014. I hope that I told you about Wireshark's CI+ dissector then ;-)
Thus wrote Alexander Adolf (alexander.ad...@condition-alpha.com): > For both topics, I would expect one likely guidance I'll be receiving > to be "submit a patch". This is of course the most productive and > easiest to manage way from the point of view of the regular > contributors who are familiar with the code ... and the best way to _become_ familiar with the code. There's no such thing as a "high-level introduction to the DVB-related functionality" document. There is, however, doc/README.dissector, which is worth a read. > (1) A little bit of streamlining of how DVB PSI/SI is presented when > analysing MPEG2-TS. I could e.g. imagine it to help readability if the > PID were shown in the source and/or destination address field. Also, > when interpreting DVB PSI/SI tables, some interpretations of > identifiers doesn't seem to be quite accurate. That sounds like a good starting point: Find a field that we don't interpret correctly. Try to find out where it's defined and modify it. Try to come up with a small and simple modification for the first patch. If you get stuck along the way, let me know which field you're looking at and prepare a ts file that you can share with us. Good luck, Martin ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
