Are we going to be picking off features one by one to get the memory footprint down? Then I see a long list of preference settings growing from this. Not something I look forward to.
On 02-08-17 20:43, Sultan, Hassan via Wireshark-dev wrote: > Hi, > > > > Am I right in my understanding that there is no global way of disabling > insertion of expert information ? > > > > Assuming I’m correct, would anyone object to me adding that setting ? That > would > be another way of lowering memory footprint. > > > > Thx, > > > > Hassan > > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
