Actually, I'd also much rather prefer to create one 2.6 and create 2.5 as a
-rc.

It would make developing that much easier. If we plan on release 2.5 as a
regular release that I am fine with it.

cheers
Roland

On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 9:13 PM, Alexis La Goutte <alexis.lagou...@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 11:45 PM, Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I think we've fixed the major issues identified by Stig, Jim, and others
>> so I'd like to release 2.5.0 on February 6. This would let us release 2.6.0
>> this spring, followed by 3.0.0 in the fall:
>>
>>
>> March: Create master-2.6 after one or two 2.5.x releases.
>>
>> April: Release 2.6.0, probably after SharkFest Asia.
>>
>> August: Release 2.9.0.
>>
>> September 7, 2018: The 2.2 branch reaches EOL.
>>
>> September or October: Create master-3.0 after one or more 2.9.x releases.
>>
>> October or November: Release 3.0.0, either before or after SharkFest
>> Europe.
>>
> Two major release this year ?
> 2.6 will be a TLS release ?
>
> For avoid a lot of cherry-pick it is better for create master(-2.6 or
> -3.0) only 2 or 3 week before 2.6 release ?
>
>>
>>
>> As discussed on this list and (IIRC) at SharkFest EU we can start
>> removing legacy support in master after master-2.6 is branched. This
>> includes, but is not limited to:
>>
>> - The GTK+ UI
>> - Older versions of GLib
>> - Qt 4.8
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> _______________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscr
>> ibe
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> _______________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=
> unsubscribe
>
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to