On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:29 PM Richard Sharpe <realrichardsha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 2:30 PM Peter Wu <pe...@lekensteyn.nl> wrote: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 08:54:58AM -0700, Richard Sharpe wrote: > > [..] > > > It doesn't look like it was manually modified. The last person who > > > touched that file was Peter Wu, it seems, so maybe he can shed some > > > light on it. > > > > How did you invoke asn2wrs.py? If I run the asn1 ninja/make target on my > > system to regenerate dissectors based on the ASN.1 inputs, there are no > > further changes. > > I ran the command recorder in the header of the .c file. > > What is this ninja/make thing you refer to?
To be more specific, I needed a callable function to dissect an ECDSA_Sig_Value, so I figured I could modify the .cnf file and run the command documented in the current packet-pkcs1.c file: /* asn2wrs.py -b -p pkcs1 -c ./pkcs1.cnf -s ./packet-pkcs1-template -D . -O ../.. PKIXAlgs-2009.asn */ However, that did not produce something that worked. It even generated different code for an unmodified .cnf file. However, just now I ran, from the build directory 'make asn1' after I modified pkcs1.cnf, and lo and behold, it modified my source directory. That was unexpected, because I thought the whole idea of cmake was that the source code would not be touched. Anyway, the code it generated does look correct (but was different to what was generated when I ran the 'documented' command) so I wonder what actual command it used. -- Regards, Richard Sharpe (何以解憂？唯有杜康。--曹操)(传说杜康是酒的发明者) ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
