On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 16:44, Robert Frohl <rfr...@suse.com> wrote:

> Hi wireshark devs,
>
> in my role as wireshark maintainer for openSUSE/SUSE I go a request for
> SMCD(v2) protocol support. Which has a pending merge request [0]. With
> the recent 3.4.0 release I suspect that the only option to fullfill this
> request on short notice is a backport to 3.4.
>
> I was wondering how these merge requests are usually handled process
> wise. Is there an indication that the change is looking good and might
> be accepted? There is no detailed description of what to look for, that
> I could find (found only [1]).
>
> What is the potential timeline of such a review ?
>

There's no rule, it's as and when a volunteer gets around to looking at it.

A lack of a capture file to test the results of the change probably isn't
helping.

Note that if this MR is merged it would be to master.  Ordinarily this
wouldn't be backported to 3.4 as that's now the stable branch that only
gets bugfixes, not enhancements, so would only be available in the nightly
builds, development builds or a locally built version.

Details of releases can be found on the wiki LifeCycle page:
https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/wikis/Development/LifeCycle
and the release policy can be found at:
https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/wikis/Development/ReleasePolicy


> Thanks,
> Robert
>
> [0] https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/merge_requests/795
> [1]
>
> https://gitlab.com/wireshark/wireshark/-/wikis/Development/SubmittingPatches#the-review-process
> --
> Security Engineer/wireshark maintainer, SUSE Software Solutions Germany
> GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, GF: Felix Imendörffer (HRB 36809,
> AG Nürnberg)
>
>

-- 
Graham Bloice
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to