Thanks,
It worked after setting "Dissect T-PDU as None" GTP preference.
Though in previous versions it worked with default settings.

Regards
Ranjeet S

On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 2:56 PM Pascal Quantin <pas...@wireshark.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Le ven. 25 déc. 2020 à 06:02, Ranjeet kumar singh <ranjeet...@gmail.com> a 
> écrit :
>>
>> it is present in 3.25 and missing in 3.4.2.
>>
>> Please see attached images. in one this field is present and in other
>> it's missing.
>>
>> I have not made any setting changes. Just installed released wireshark
>> and opened a captured file with gtp packet.
>
>
> I cannot reproduce your issue: by setting the "Dissect T-PDU as None" GTP 
> preference, I do get the T-PDU data payload displayed with 3.4.2. If I let 
> the default value (TPDU Heuristic) it properly identifies the payload as IP.
> So it could be related to your GTP-U PDU where the heuristic fails for 
> example. Please check the behavior if you sendure to set the preference to 
> None and share the packet if it still fails.
>
> Best regards.
>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Ranjeet S
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 1:46 PM Dario Lombardo <lom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Can you please tell a version in which is present and a version in which 
>> > is not?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 8:54 AM Ranjeet kumar singh <ranjeet...@gmail.com> 
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> Gtp packets used to have a tpdu_data field.
>> >>
>> >> I don't see it in the latest wireshark.
>> >>
>> >> This is causing my lua plugins to break.
>> >>
>> >> Can someone please fix it.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Ranjeet S
>> >> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> >> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> >> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> >> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> >>              
>> >> mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > Naima is online.
>> >
>> > ___________________________________________________________________________
>> > Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> > Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>> >              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>              mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to