Thanks All, I decided to take the nuclear option as I realised I had set my repositories up incorrectly, I think because I started with the old doc ( https://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/SubmittingPatches ) rather than the new doc. Things seem better now.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 11:46 PM Guy Harris <ghar...@sonic.net> wrote: > On Mar 5, 2021, at 3:07 PM, Maynard, Christopher via Wireshark-dev < > wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> wrote: > > >> From: Wireshark-dev <wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org> On Behalf Of > chuck c > >> Sent: Friday, March 5, 2021 5:26 PM > >> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > >> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] Struggling to rebase > >> > >> But sometimes I'm this guy: > >> https://twitter.com/catalinmpit/status/1301965170076459009 > > > > Naturally, there's a relevant xkcd for this: https://xkcd.com/1597/ > > https://twitter.com/spences10/status/1301973429206343686 > > Or, to quote Ellen Ripley: > > I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the > only way to be sure. > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org > ?subject=unsubscribe -- Paul Offord
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
